Legal Opinion
Alropa Corporation v. Pomerance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 25, 1940No. 13050PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
The rulings announced in head-notes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 do not require elaboration.
There is no question about Alropa being a successor in title to the notes and mortgage executed by Warde to Mack, or that the notes and security were outstanding at the time of the deed from Warde to Pomerance. That deed contained the blause: “This deed is made subject to a first mortgage in the sum of three thousand ($3000) dollars, from Paul C. Warde and wife, to Chas. D. Mack, which as part of the consideration for this conveyance grantee assumes and agrées to pay.” A question…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Elder v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Georgia Southern Railroad v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Union City Realty & Trust Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- McAlhany v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Motz v. Alropa CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.