Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Forster

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1930No. Appeal 205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

This is a bill in equity brought to restrain interference to the right of the plaintiff in a private alley. The facts stated as briefly as possible are as follows: On July 15,1901, Wesley E. Bonzo and wife conveyed to Kittie E. Schmidt a part of a larger tract of land in the Borough of Rochester, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, the lot conveyed being in part described as follows: “thence extending back along said lot 105 feet to a private alley of said Wesley E. Bonzo; thence along said alley 28.5 feet to an alley.” After the description follows the recital and then the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Witman v. StichterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Ulrich v. Wm. S. and Alice GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Holmes v. LongwillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Rhoads v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Walker Et Ux. v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Hassler v. MummertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Hoover v. FrickanisceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Tarolli v. Westvale Genesee, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API