Schmidt v. Forster
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, P. J.,
This is a bill in equity brought to restrain interference to the right of the plaintiff in a private alley. The facts stated as briefly as possible are as follows: On July 15,1901, Wesley E. Bonzo and wife conveyed to Kittie E. Schmidt a part of a larger tract of land in the Borough of Rochester, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, the lot conveyed being in part described as follows: “thence extending back along said lot 105 feet to a private alley of said Wesley E. Bonzo; thence along said alley 28.5 feet to an alley.” After the description follows the recital and then the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Witman v. StichterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ulrich v. Wm. S. and Alice GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Holmes v. LongwillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Rhoads v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taylor v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Walker Et Ux. v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Hassler v. MummertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Hoover v. FrickanisceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Tarolli v. Westvale Genesee, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958