Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zimmerman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1914No. Appeal, No. 186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 186, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 177, aflBrming judgment of Justice of the Peace in case of Commonwealth v. Hiram Zimmerman et al. Appeal from judgment of justice of the peace.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 186, Oct. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. 177, aflBrming judgment of Justice of the Peace in case of Commonwealth v. Hiram Zimmerman et al. Appeal from judgment of justice of the peace. Koch, J., filed the following opinion: This case is one of summary conviction and is before us on appeal specially allowed by the court: Section 14, art. V, Const.; Act of April 17, 1876, P. L. 29, and is to be disposed of by the court without the intervention of a jury: Com. v. Waldman, 140 Pa. 89; Com. v. Layton, 45 Pa. Superior Ct. 582, 585. Joel…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the court of quarter sessions affirming, on appeal, a judgment of a justice of the peace in a summary conviction under the Act of April 14, 1905, P. L. 169. The case was heard by the court without a jury, and, of course, the evidence taken on the hearing was not sent up with the record. It is insisted by appellee’s counsel that under the circumstances the opinion of the court must be deemed to contain all the facts that can be considered on this appeal. The defendants certainly have no standing to insist that any other facts can be considered,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Lutheran Conference and Camp Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Hassler v. MummertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Schmidt v. ForsterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. MorrisFayette County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API