Legal Opinion
Naze v. Inhabitants of Hudson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 2, 1924PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action under G. L. c. 84, § 15, to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff by reason of falling upon a sidewalk in the defendant town. She testified that as she was going along she struck her foot against a stump and stumbled and fell on the ice; that the ice was in a hole in the sidewalk near the stump and a patch had been put over the hole; that the stump was about four or five inches higher than the sidewalk; that it was in the gravel or sand part of the sidewalk alongside the concrete; that a root of the stump ran into the edge of the concrete and raised the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Bowes v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Winship v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- McGuinness v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Tobin v. Inhabitants of BrimfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Jennes v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- DeMarco v. PeaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Dooling v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Murphy v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.