Legal Opinion

City of Eugene v. Nalven

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. 16-95-06123; CA A93715Published

1Opinion of the Court

955 P.2d 263 (1998)

152 Or. App. 720

CITY OF EUGENE, a municipal corporation, Respondent,

v.

Barbara Kashin NALVEN, Appellant.

16-95-06123; CA A93715.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted March 7, 1997.

Resubmitted September 4, 1997.

Decided February 25, 1998.

Michael D. Linick, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Jens Schmidt, eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C.

In Banc.[*]

Resubmitted In Banc September 4, 1997.

LANDAU, Judge.

In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, the City of Eugene (City)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Richards v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. City of Eugene v. NalvenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Fales v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API