Legal Opinion

Cassaday v. Mendham

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 26, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00951Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY, Petitioner, Case No. 1:22-cv-951 v. Honorable Gordon J. Quist MAARTEN VERMAAT, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a federal pretrial detainee under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), and for preliminary review under 28 U.S.C. § 2243. I. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis Petitioner has filed an affidavit of indigence in support of his request…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API