Legal Opinion

Mills v. Dieco, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided October 4, 1989No. DC89-30-B-0PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BIGGERS, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court on motion of defendant Dieco, Incorporated to dismiss the complaint of plaintiffs Mark Mills and Kathryn Mills on the basis that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant.

Pacts

The plaintiffs, Pennsylvania residents, were injured in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 7, 1987, when the car in which they were traveling collided with a delivery truck owned and operated by the defendant. Almost a year after their cause of action expired under the Tennessee statute of limitations, the plaintiffs filed this suit in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence Washington v. Norton Manufacturing, Inc., Abc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sam Smith v. Dewalt Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Collins v. Truck Equipment Sales, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. FoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Black v. Carey Canada, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  3. Walter Herrley and Judith Sund Herrley v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., and Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Madison v. Revlon, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991
  5. Murray v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API