Legal Opinion
Black v. Carey Canada, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 3, 1990No. Civ. A. S89-0470(G), S89-0468(G), S89-0509(R), S89-0510(G), S89-0511(G), S89-0465(G), S89-0466(G), S89-0464(G)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEX, District Judge.
These causes come before this Court on the Motions to Dismiss of the Defendants, Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Fibreboard Corporation, Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Keene Corporation, Carey-Canada, Inc., and U.S. Mineral Products Co. (the named defendants). The Court has duly considered the record in these actions, in addition to the briefs of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, concludes as follows:
Facts
The plaintiffs in these actions are all residents 1 of the State of California. The plaintiffs’ complaints allege that…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Thompson v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Shaw v. BurchfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Montgomery v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Archer v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Peters v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
- Smith v. Union National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.