Legal Opinion
Murray v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 16, 1991No. Civ. A. S90-0125(G)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEX, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on motion of the defendant, Remington Arms Company, Inc. [Remington], to set aside the purported service of process upon it in this matter and to dismiss this action as to Remington for lack of personal jurisdiction. After due consideration of the briefs of counsel, the applicable law, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, this Court finds that the motion is well-taken and should be granted.
Statement of Facts
On or about March 12, 1990, the plaintiffs filed their original complaint in this Court seeking damages…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thompson v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Jose Demelo and Marie Demelo v. Toche Marine, Inc., Woolsey Marine Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Lakota Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Havey Fund-Raising Management, Inc., and Francis P. HaveyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Lawrence Washington v. Norton Manufacturing, Inc., Abc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore Video Distributors, Inc. v. Quest Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993
- Peterson v. Test International, E.C.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1995