Legal Opinion

Blachford v. Frenzer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1895No. 5779PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Irvine, J. cited: Lee v. Stiles, 21 Conn., 500; Ladd v. Dubroca, 45 Ala., 421; Barto v. Abbe, 16 O , 408; Brown v. Burdick, 25 O. St., 260; Grant v. Marshall, 12 Neb., 488.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, O.

• This is a petition in error prosecuted to this court by Mrs. M. A. Blachford to reversea judgment of the district court *830of Douglas county rendered against her in favor of Peter Frenzer. The action was forcible detainer and brought by Frenzer against one C. E. Ham and the plaintiff in error. The jury in the district court found Mrs. Ham not guilty, and a judgment to go hence without day was by the district court pronounced in her favor. The jury found a verdict of guilty against Mrs. Blachford, on which the judgment was pronounced, which she seeks to reverse by this proceeding.

1.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. ConstableOregon Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cummins Management, L.P. v. GilroyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Board of Educational Lands and Funds v. GillettNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pedro v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Schmidt v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Richardson v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API