Legal Opinion

Raynor v. Kyser

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 8, 1999No. 99-25PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case. Appellant, Cleo Raynor appeals the summary judgment entered against her by the Pulaski County Circuit Court on the basis of Arkansas’s two-year statute of limitations on medical malpractice claims. Raynor contends the statute was tolled by operation of the “continuous treatment” doctrine. Appellee, Dr. James Kyser, responds that the doctrine doesn’t apply to the instant facts. We agree and affirm.

Raynor first sought and received medical care from Dr. Kyser in January of 1985. Dr. Kyser diagnosed her condition as nasal polyps,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Angle v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Deanna Slagle Roberts v. Darryl Francis, M.D. St. Edward Mercy Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rainey v. HartnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Harlfinger v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Newcourt Financial, Inc. v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Pledger v. CarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Baker v. Radiology Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API