Legal Opinion
Rainey v. Hartness
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 2, 1999No. 99-529PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD L. Corbin, Justice.
Appellants Jerry Rainey and James tice. civil-rights suit in the Grant County Circuit Court against Appellee James Hartness, a wildlife enforcement officer with the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. The suit alleged that Hartness (1) entered their property without authority; (2) seized Harton’s rifle through an illegal search and converted it without due process of law and just compensation; and (3) damaged their crops by driving over them on a four-wheel, all-terrain vehicle. The trial court granted summary judgment to Hartness, and Appellants appealed. Our…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Smith v. BRTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Baldridge v. CordesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Banks v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.