People v. Rebolledo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Appellant was duly arraigned before a magistrate on charges of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code, and rape accomplished with a girl 10 years of age. At the time of his arraignment an interpreter was present, the complaint was read to appellant, he gave his true name and was informed of his legal rights. The preliminary hearing was set for and held two weeks later, at which time an interpreter was sworn to interpret and did interpret the testimony of some of the witnesses.
The evidence produced at the preliminary hearing shows that Ramona Tafoola, the prosecutrix, was walking home from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. McRaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hsu v. Mt. Zion HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- McCarthy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. PhippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. RosboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.