Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Curnayn

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 13, 2006No. CA 06-70PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John B. Robbins, Judge.

This is the second appeal of this lawsuit filed by appellant, B. J. McAdams, against a veterinary clinic and its employees1 regarding harm appellant alleged came to his sixteen-year-old dog, Mr. T, during a clinic visit on February 14, 2000. Appellant contends that the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants/appellees constitutes reversible error. Appellant additionally contends that the trial court erred in refusing to recuse on this case. We disagree with his assertions and affirm.

This cause of action arose from the following chain of events. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crockett v. EssexSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Coulter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Cash v. LimSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Rice v. TannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Lee Ko v. Esther WillsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
  3. Hamilton v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Hamilton v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. McAdams v. CurnaynCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API