Legal Opinion

Cash v. Lim

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 6, 1995No. 95-168PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The áppellants, Jane A. Cash

and Hugh Cash, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellees Dr. Rodolfo Espaldón Lim and Pine Bluff Radiologists, Ltd. They contend that a genuine issue of material fact concerning causation in their medical malpractice claim remains to be resolved and that, accordingly, summary judgment was not appropriate under Ark. R. Civ. P. 56(c). We agree, and we reverse the summary judgment and remand the matter for trial.

On April 8, 1993, the Cashes filed a medical malpractice complaint against Dr. Lim and his radiology clinic, Pine Bluff…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Keck v. American Employment Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Young v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Reagan v. City of PiggottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Crockett v. EssexSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Milam v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Chambers v. SternSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API