Legal Opinion

People v. Buckey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1985No. Docket Nos. 73929, 74232. (Calendar Nos. 6, 7)PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley J.

The issue common to both of these cases, and the one which we directed the parties to address, is whether error requiring reversal occurs when the prosecutor argues that the defendant’s presence at trial is an opportunity for the defendant to fabricate testimony.

The Court of Appeals panels in both cases answered affirmatively, thus reversing defendants’ convictions. We reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals.

In Buckey,1 two members of the Court of Appeals panel also held that questions by the prosecutor during cross-examination of defendant concerning whether various prosecution…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. BoboMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. People v. EricksenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Portuondo v. AgardSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. People v. AvantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. GainesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API