Legal Opinion

O'Nesti v. DeBartolo Realty Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2007No. 2005-2093PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal requires this court to establish the parameters that apply when a plaintiff who was not a party to an earlier suit seeks to use the result of that suit to prevail against a defendant who was also the defendant in the former suit. Specifically, we are called upon to determine whether Ohio recognizes offensive claim preclusion or embraces the wait-and-see analysis for purposes of claim or issue preclusion. We determine that because appellees, Gary O’Nesti and Leon Zionts, are not in privity with the plaintiffs in an earlier lawsuit, they cannot bar appellants, DeBartolo Realty…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Fort Frye Teachers Ass'n v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. SavickasIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Anderson Ex Rel. C.A. v. City of Blue AshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State of Ohio Ex Rel. Boggs v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParksOhio Supreme Court · 2010

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API