Legal Opinion

Gates v. Shaner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1951No. 17589PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. “The courts of this State have no extra-territorial jurisdiction, and cannot make the citizens of foreign States amenable to their process, or conclude them by a judgment in personam, without their consent.” Dearing v. The Bank of Charleston, 5 Ga. 497 (5); Hood v. Hood, 130 Ga. 610, 612 (61 S. E. 471); Gordy v. Levison & Co., 157 Ga. 670, 677 (122 S. E. 234); Hood Brick Co. v. Mangham, 161 Ga. 457, 459 (131 S. E. 172); Irons v. American National Bank, 178 Ga. 160, 179 (172 S. E. 629); Grimmett v. Barnwell, 184 Ga. 461, 462 (192 S. E. 191, 116 A. L. R. 257); Webb & Martin v.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  3. Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Langston v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Adams v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Slowik v. KnorrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Ashburn v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Tuten v. TutenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. Strauss v. StraussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API