Tuten v. Tuten
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
1. " 'The courts of this state have no extra-territorial jurisdiction, and cannot make the citizens of foreign states amenable to their process, or conclude them by a judgment in personam, without their consent.’ Dearing v. Bank of Charleston, 5 Ga. 497 (5); Gates v. Shaner, 208 Ga. 454 (67 SE2d 569) and cases cited.” Slowik v. Knorr, 222 Ga. 669, 671 (151 SE2d 726). Therefore, although the superior court rendering a decree in a divorce action retains exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the provisions therein relating to custody of the minor children of the parties by attachment for contempt,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Connell v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Slowik v. KnorrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Ogletree v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Photocopy Equipment Co. v. Lew Deadmore & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Ashburn v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Strauss v. StraussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Downey v. DowneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Association v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.