Legal Opinion

Tuten v. Tuten

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1971No. 26158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

1. " 'The courts of this state have no extra-territorial jurisdiction, and cannot make the citizens of foreign states amenable to their process, or conclude them by a judgment in personam, without their consent.’ Dearing v. Bank of Charleston, 5 Ga. 497 (5); Gates v. Shaner, 208 Ga. 454 (67 SE2d 569) and cases cited.” Slowik v. Knorr, 222 Ga. 669, 671 (151 SE2d 726). Therefore, although the superior court rendering a decree in a divorce action retains exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the provisions therein relating to custody of the minor children of the parties by attachment for contempt,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Connell v. ConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Slowik v. KnorrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  4. Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Ogletree v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Photocopy Equipment Co. v. Lew Deadmore & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Ashburn v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Strauss v. StraussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Downey v. DowneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Association v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API