Legal Opinion

Martz v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1991No. 89C-11747; CA A67137PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.510 et seq. He assigns error to the post-conviction court’s ruling that his conviction was not void because of inadequate assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to two counts of sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. The trial court imposed a sentence of 20 years imprisonment, with a 10-year minimum. Petitioner sought post-conviction relief. Before the hearing, he requested that his counsel assert a substantial denial of his state and federal constitutional rights on the basis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API