Legal Opinion
Broughton Lumber Company v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1992No. 91-35183PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKER, District Judge:
Broughton Lumber Company (Brough-ton), appeals the district court’s order dismissing its inverse condemnation action against the states of Oregon and Washington (the States) and its declaratory judgment and inverse condemnation actions against the Columbia River Gorge Commission (Commission) brought pursuant to 16 U.S.C. §§ 544-544p (1989). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Broughton, a Washington Corporation, owns a 108.53 acre lot within the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. In August, 1988, Broughton submitted a land use application to the Commission to subdivide its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Seven Up Pete Venture v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Skamania County v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.