Adams v. Department of Transportation

In this appeal as of right, plaintiff asserts that Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm, 463 Mich 143; 615 NW2d 702 (2000),1 should be given prospective application only and, if not, that Nawrocki is distinguishable from the present case and thus inapplicable. In essence, plaintiff claims that the Court of Claims’ grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant on the basis of Nawrocki was inappropriate because Nawrocki should be applied prospectively only. We reverse the Court of Claims’ grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant, but only because we are bound by this Court’s recent…