Cooley v. Arizona Public Service Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcGREGOR, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Cooley presented sufficient evidence of a sidewalk defect to raise a disputed issue of material fact as to APS's constructive notice of the defect and concur in the remainder of the opinion.
I
In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and the record in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Granite State Insurance Corp. v. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co., 117 Ariz. 432, 573 P.2d 506 (App.1977). Summary judgment or a directed verdict is proper “if the facts produced in support of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- City of Phoenix v. WeedonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.