Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2006No. 27308PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.

Harry L. Fisher (“Movant”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 1 post-conviction relief motion without an ev-identiary hearing. Movant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to ade quately investigate, and that his due process rights under the Missouri and United States Constitutions were violated when the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence. We agree in part and reverse.

Movant was charged with the class C felonies of possession of a controlled…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Hill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Allen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Harris v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API