Legal Opinion
Tate v. Costa
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 18, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. Super. 527 (1954)
103 A.2d 16
OPHELIA TATE, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF HOWARD LEE CROWELL. DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN J. COSTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 25, 1954.
Decided February 18, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Theodore D. Parsons argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Harry Edelson, attorney).
Mr. Robert V. Carton argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McKinney v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Jones v. LahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Pirozzi v. Acme Holding Company of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Dobrow v. HertzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Lipschitz v. New York & New Jersey Produce Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. TynesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Bergquist v. PentermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957