Legal Opinion

Dobrow v. Hertz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 10, 1940PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

This is a suit allegedly based upon actionable negligence. The basic question requiring decision is whether the trial judge erred in directing a verdict of no cause of action in favor of the defendant Samuel Hertz.

On Saturday evening, January 16th, 1937, Samuel Hertz, respondent here and defendant below, invited Jack Lieberman and Ruth Lieberman, his wife, appellants here and plaintiffs below, and two other friends, to accompany him and his wife to a show in New York. The party of six left Passaic, New Jersey, saw the show in New York, had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Repasky v. NovichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Dickinson v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Christine v. Mutual Grocery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Courtney v. Garden State LinesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Barry v. Borden Farm Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCorvey v. Utah State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Genovay v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Gindin v. BaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. HOPPER'S, INC. v. Red Bank Airport, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Redd v. Airway Motor Coach Lines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API