Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Terenzi

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 30, 1985No. CV 85-2572PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Decision and Order

MISHLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, pro se, bring this action for injunctive relief and monetary damages on the ground that defendant United States Probation Officer Elaine Terenzi, acting under color of federal law, deprives them of their constitutional rights by refusing to permit them to travel outside this district. Plaintiffs ask this court to compel defendant to grant plaintiff Rizzo’s request that he be permitted to travel to Florida for a period of thirty days. While plaintiffs characterize their claim as a Bivens action, the court construes this action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Paul Ivan Birzon, in Behalf of Morris Satz v. Edward S. King, United States Marshal and Hon. Michael A. Amico, Sheriff of Erie CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LoFranco v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Singleton v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  3. Pelland v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Trisvan v. AnnucciDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. Lines v. WargoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API