Bare v. Wayne Poultry Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Though the main question for determination is whether plaintiff is barred from Workers’ Compensation benefits because she was injured while participating in horseplay with a fellow employee, we address first the defendants’ only other contention: That there is no support in the evidence for the Full Commission’s finding of fact that it was customary for the processing line employees to play around with each other with their chicken deboning knives and this activity was apparently condoned by the employer. Concerning this, plaintiffs testimony was as follows:
Q. Was it usual to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Buser v. Southern Food Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Thomas v. Northern Telecom, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Harrison v. Edison Bros. Apparel Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Atkins v. USF Dugan, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Freeman v. RothrockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.