State v. Harvest
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
James R. Cooper, Judge.
In this criminal case the appellee, Levi Harvest, was charged with delivery of a controlled substance. At the close of the State’s case, the trial court granted the appellee’s motion for a directed verdict. The State appeals, arguing three points: that the trial court erred in ruling that Dale Arnold’s in-court repetition of Frederick Swopes’ statements, made in the course of the drug deal, was accomplice testimony; that the trial court erred in ruling that the appellee could not be convicted as an accomplice because his alleged accomplice, Frederick Swopes, had been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- State v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- State v. SchaubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- State v. MasserySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- State v. MasserySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990