Legal Opinion

State v. Harvest

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 18, 1989No. CA CR 88-162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

In this criminal case the appellee, Levi Harvest, was charged with delivery of a controlled substance. At the close of the State’s case, the trial court granted the appellee’s motion for a directed verdict. The State appeals, arguing three points: that the trial court erred in ruling that Dale Arnold’s in-court repetition of Frederick Swopes’ statements, made in the course of the drug deal, was accomplice testimony; that the trial court erred in ruling that the appellee could not be convicted as an accomplice because his alleged accomplice, Frederick Swopes, had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. State v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. State v. SchaubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. State v. MasserySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. State v. MasserySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API