Legal Opinion

State v. Massery

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1990No. CR 89-91PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

793 S.W.2d 108 (1990)

302 Ark. 447

STATE of Arkansas, Appellant,

v.

David MASSERY, Appellee.

No. CR 89-91.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 11, 1990.

2DissentHays, Justice

The trial court excluded the results of an Intoxilyzer Test because the officer, B.R. Keyes, did not have personal knowledge that the simulator he used to calibrate the Intoxilyzer was a brand of simulator approved by the Arkansas Department of Health in its Regulation 4.31. In so doing, I believe the trial court placed a greater burden on the state than either our statutes or case law require. The state is fully justified, as I see it, in appealing that…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Spear & BoyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Sparrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. State v. DuLaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Munn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Marx v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JoshawaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API