Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Massery

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1990No. CR 89-91Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

The trial court excluded the results of an Intoxilyzer Test because the officer, B.R. Keyes, did not have personal knowledge that the simulator he used to calibrate the Intoxilyzer was a brand of simulator approved by the Arkansas Department of Health in its Regulation 4.31. In so doing, I believe the trial court placed a greater burden on the state than either our statutes or case law require. The state is fully justified, as I see it, in appealing that ruling.

It was not disputed at trial that the Breathalyzer was approved and certified, rather, at issue was a Stephenson “simulator” used to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Spear & BoyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Sparrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. State v. DuLaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Munn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Marx v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API