Legal Opinion

People v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Margett, J.

Our primary task upon this appeal is to determine whether either the Suffolk County Financial Disclosure Law (the Disclosure Law),1 the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or the common-law “public interest privilege” provides a proper basis for quashing a duly issued Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum which demands the production of financial disclosure statements allegedly filed with the Suffolk County Board of Public Disclosure (the board) by a Suffolk County public official pursuant to the Disclosure Law. Our conclusion is that under the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Grand Jury Subpoenas for Local 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. In re the Application to Quash Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In re Grand Jury Subpoena June 30, 2003New York Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. JacobsNew York Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API