Legal Opinion

Starr v. Detroit Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1941No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 41,536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

On July 28,1937, W. O. Noack’s Sons, Inc., a wholesale jewelry concern, borrowed $6,000 from the defendant bank on a 90-day note, due October 26, 1937, indorsed by one John J. Schantz. When the note became due no payment was made on principal and a renewal note was given for 30 days, with the same indorsement. On November 26th, when this note became due, the company paid $1,000 on principal by check on a commercial account in the bank and gave the bank a renewal note for the balance, $5,000, due in 30 days, with the same indorsement. On December 27, 1937, when this note became due the company…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Stucky v. Masonic Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weidman Lumber Co. v. SpearMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API