Legal Opinion

Dragonas v. Macerich

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 1, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01648Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bill Dragonas, Jr., No. CV-20-01648-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Macerich, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 There are three motions before the Court. Defendant Macerich1 has moved to 16 dismiss Plaintiff Bill Dragonas, Jr.’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 18.) Mr. 17 Dragonas seeks leave to file both a sur-reply (Doc. 22) and an amended complaint (Doc. 18 25). For the following reasons, the Court will grant Macerich’s motion to dismiss. Mr. 19 Dragonas’s pending motions will be denied.2 20 I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API