Adams v. The Brink's Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge:
Appellants petition for review of the final order of the district court which disposed of most of Appellants’ claims, denying additional pension benefits under the Pittston Plan. Appellees cross-appeal the district court judgment with respect to Christopher Brooks Addington, who succeeded on his breach of fiduciary duty claim. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
Appellants are former employees of Paramont Coal Corporation and current and/or former employees of the Pittston Company, a subsidiary of the Brink’s Company. J.A. 101. In this action, Appellants seek…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. WallerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Coffey v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
- Estate of Spinner v. Anthem Health Plans of Va.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
- Frank v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Moon v. BWX Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- Phillips v. BRINK'S CO.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.