Legal Opinion

Adams v. The Brink's Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2008No. 06-1744, 06-1770UnpublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, District Judge:

Appellants petition for review of the final order of the district court which disposed of most of Appellants’ claims, denying additional pension benefits under the Pittston Plan. Appellees cross-appeal the district court judgment with respect to Christopher Brooks Addington, who succeeded on his breach of fiduciary duty claim. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I

Appellants are former employees of Paramont Coal Corporation and current and/or former employees of the Pittston Company, a subsidiary of the Brink’s Company. J.A. 101. In this action, Appellants seek…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. WallerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Coffey v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
  2. Estate of Spinner v. Anthem Health Plans of Va.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. Frank v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Moon v. BWX Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
  5. Phillips v. BRINK'S CO.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API