DIAMOND PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. Handsel

*493OPINION

CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.

In this permissive interlocutory appeal, we address whether this court may consider the appeal in the absence of a timely-filed application for permission to appeal as required by section 51.014(f) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and, if so, whether this appeal meets the standards for permissive appeals contemplated by the statute. We deny the application for interlocutory appeal and dismiss the appeal.

Discussion

Appellant, Diamond Products International, Inc. (“DPI”) terminated the employment of appellee, Arthur M. Handsel. Ap-pellee sued DPI…