Legal Opinion

Stolte v. County of Guadalupe

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 26, 2004No. 04-04-00083-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.

The issue before us is whether this court has jurisdiction over this permissive interlocutory appeal in the absence of the timely-filed application for permission to appeal contemplated by section 51.014(f) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. We hold that, if a timely-filed application to appeal is jurisdictional, this jurisdictional requirement is subject to the motion for extension of time provided in Rule 26.3(b), Tex.R.App. P., and the implied motion for extension of time recognized in Verburgt v. Domer, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.1997). We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hone v. HanafinTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. in the Interest of D.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DIAMOND PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. Handsel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. State Fair of Texas v. Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  3. Inliner Americas, Inc. v. MaComb Funding Group, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. DIAMOND PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. Handsel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Diamond Products International, Inc. v. Arthur M. Handsel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API