Legal Opinion
Edward Heisler v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1968No. 22292_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Heisler appeals from his conviction under an indictment reading:
“On or about the 15th day of June, 1967, in the District of Arizona, EDWARD HEISLER, with intent to defraud, did pass and utter to Lawrence . W. Woodruff a counterfeit obligation of the United States, that is, a $20.00 Federal Reserve Note, Serial No. L15506070*, and EDWARD HEISLER then knew the note was counterfeit.”
He waived a jury and was tried by the court.
Every fact stated in the indictment was proved by direct' testimony, save one. The note passed was a $10.00 note, not a $20.00 note. When this…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascal, United States of America v. Paul Gordon FrakesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Jerry R. Mastelotto, and Willis B. InglesbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. William F. Schoenhut, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.