Legal Opinion

Bull v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1932No. 1005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

This is a suit to recover damages for slander. The allegations undertaking to set forth the defamatory words, in so far as same constituted the basis of the judgment below, were that “ * ⅜ * • the defendant (i. e., A. R. Collins) accused the plaintiff herein (i. e., R. L. Bull) of embezzlement and theft, making the statement that $15.00 had been missed from one of the drug stores and that either the plaintiff herein or another one of the employees, Harmon Morrison, Jr., had taken the said money.” It was alleged that by such statement was meant that “they had stolen it.” There were other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradstreet Co. v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Runge v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Harbison v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Evans v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. CaskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lyle v. WaddleTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Campbell v. Jacksonville Kennel ClubSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. SkinnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Peniche v. AeromexicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API