Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 21, 2020No. 3:18-cv-08360Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Alejandro S Estrada, No. CV-18-08360-PCT-MTL 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michelle Burns’ Report and 15 Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 17), recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas 16 Corpus (Doc. 1) be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner filed an Objection to 17 the R & R. (Doc. 19.) Respondents filed a Response (Doc. 18) and Petitioner filed a Reply 18 (Doc. 20). After considering the R & R (Doc. 17),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Carlos Mendoza v. Tom L. Carey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API