Young v. Oak Electro-Netics Corp.

The plaintiff argues: (1) She is entitled to recover from the defendant employer because the action is based upon her employment contract and not upon an insurance contract; (2) that she completed the three months of required service for eligibility; and (3) her claim should not be defeated by any terms of the insurance contract.

The facts are agreed. The plaintiff commenced work for the defendant on January 6, 1964, and worked continuously through Friday, April 3, 1964. Saturday and Sunday, April 4th and 5th, were not working days. On Monday, April 6th, the plaintiff was stricken with an…