State ex rel. Ewing v. A Motion Picture Film Entitled "Without A Stitch"
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
The granting of the motion to certify allowing this appeal removed the issue of obscenity from *97this case. There remain the following four issues: (1) The applicability of B. C. 3767.01 et seq. to a theater in eases involving the exhibition of a single obscene motion picture film; (2) the constitutionality of R. C. 3767.01 et seq. prescribing a method for controlling obscenity; (3) the mandatory or discretionary nature of the remedies set forth in B. C. 3767.01 et seq.; and' (4) the availability of the nonstatutory remedy of forfeiture of box office receipts derived from the exhibition of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Universal Amusement Co., Inc. v. Carol Vance King Arts Theatre, Inc. v. George E. McCrea the State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fantozzi v. Sandusky Cement Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.