Legal Opinion
Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 25, 1999No. 17579-1-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
977 P.2d 608 (1999)
95 Wash.App. 563
Dennis HAYDEN, Randy Hayden, and Cosmas St. Hilaire, d/b/a Hayden Farms, Appellants,
v.
MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO., a Washington corporation, Respondent.
No. 17579-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.
April 15, 1999.
Publication Ordered May 25, 1999.
John J. Carroll, Velikanje, Moore & Shore, Yakima, for Appellants.
Jeffory E. Adams, Murray, Dunham & Murray, Seattle, for Respondent.
BROWN, J.
We review a claim of breach of duty to defend and indemnify brought by Hayden Farms on an assignment against Mutual of Enumclaw (MOE). The trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Stuart v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Stuart v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000