Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1994No. 61000-2PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.

Facts of Case

In 1992, the Weyerhaeuser Company filed a declaratory judgment action against many of its insurers seeking a declaration of coverage with regard to alleged property damage at some 42 allegedly polluted sites in a number of states.

The insurance policies involved were issued over a period of time from approximately 1951 through 1985. The policies were described as various primary, umbrella, and excess Comprehensive General Liability policies. The defendant insurers presently remaining in the case all appear to be excess insurers. Weyerhaeuser asserts that some policies contain a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Central Illinois Light Co. v. Home InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API