Legal Opinion
Norwood Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guiltinan (In Re Guiltinan)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided March 18, 1986No. 19-00612PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES
LOUISE DeCARL MALUGEN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtor, Robert M. Guiltinan, has brought a motion for an award of attorneys fees as against Norwood Federal Savings And Loan Association (“Norwood Federal”) and its attorneys pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9011 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927.
Guiltinan filed a Chapter 7 proceeding on December 31, 1984. Norwood Federal was listed as a creditor in his proceeding and duly noticed. On April 12, 1985, Norwood Federal filed a complaint entitled “Complaint Objecting To Discharge,” claiming, “This is an action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. Chicago Industrial Tire Co., Appeal of Themis N. Anastos and Paul E. PeldyakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Kurt Von Poppenheim v. Portland Boxing & Wrestling CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Geraldine Marie Blodgett, in Re Hector C. Perez, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wonder Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re Wonder Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Styler v. Tall Oaks, Inc. (In Re Hatch)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1988
- Chase v. Kosmala (In re Loyd)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003