Legal Opinion

Weber v. Moog

New York City Court

Decided July 1, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the special term requiring him to file security for costs.

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This appeal must be determined only upon the papers before the special term. The parties, in points submitted after the argument, have each stated facts not appearing in the affidavits. We cannot regard such statements. The affidavits upon *109winch the order was granted show that the summons and complaint were served May 4, 1881. The defendant served an answer May 16,1881, and on the same day obtained an order ex parte requiring plaintiff to file security for costs. This order was subsequently set aside upon plaintiff’s motion, and defendant, on July 21, 1881, gave notice of the motion which…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sims v. BonnerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
  2. Kokomo Straw Board Co. v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Segal v. CauldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Segal v. CauldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Sims v. BonnerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API