Legal Opinion

Sims v. Bonner

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1891Published

Appeal from an order denying motion to compel the plaintiff, George V. Sims, to file security for costs.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Gildersleeve, J.

It is well settled that defendant’s right to demand security for costs, under section 3268 of the Code, from a non-resident plaintiff, is absolute, unless defendant waives that right by laches ; in which case it becomes discretionary with the court to grant the motion, upon defendant’s satisfactory explanation of his delay. See Buckley v. Gutta Percha Co., 3 Civ. Pro. R., 428; Churchman v. Merritt, 50 Hun, 270; Wood v Blodgett, 15 Civ. Pro. R., 114; Robertson v. Barnum, 29 Hun, 657; Healy v. The Twenty-third Street Railway Co., 1 Civ. Pro. R., 15; *64Abel v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Churchman v. MerrittNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fisher v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1884
  3. Weber v. MoogNew York City Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API