Legal Opinion

Sims v. Bonner

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided December 14, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by George Y. Sims and another against Edward L. Bonner and •another. From an order denying a motion to compel plaintiffs to file security for costs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

It is well settled that defendant’s right to demand security for costs, under section 3268 of the Code, from a non-resident plaintiff, is absolute, unless defendant waives that right by loches, in which case it becomes discretionary with the court to grant the motion, upon defendant’s satisfactory explanation of his delay. See Buckley v. Gutta-Percha Co., 3 Civil Proc. R. 428; Churchman v. Merritt, (Sup.) 2 N. Y. Supp. 843; Wood v. Blodgett, Id. 304; Robertson v. Barnum, 29 Hun, 657; Healy v. Railway Co., 1 Civil Proc. R. 15; Abell v. Bradner, 3 N. Y. Supp. 20; Kleinpeter v. Enell, 2 Civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Churchman v. MerrittNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fisher v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1884
  3. Weber v. MoogNew York City Court · 1882
  4. Abell v. BradnerNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ambler v. AmblerNew York Supreme Court · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacGinniss v. Amalgamated Copper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Winkley Co. v. Bowen Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1910
  3. Johnson v. Metropolitan Street-Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API