Legal Opinion
Walker v. Schriro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2005No. 04-16356; D.C. No. CV-02-02122-JWSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Carlton Langely Walker appeals the district court’s dismissal of his federal habeas petition for failure to comply with the one-year time limitation imposed by the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
I
We review the district court’s denial of habeas corpus for failure to comply with AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitation de novo. Laws v. Lamarque, 351 F.3d 919, 922 (9th Cir.2003). The factual findings underlying the court’s decision, including the court’s determination of whether mental incompetence prevented the petitioner…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brian Keith Laws v. A.A. Lamarque, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Anthony (Tony) Gaston v. Anna Ramirez PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- DiPaulo v. PotterDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Roane v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Robison v. HinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Clark v. WolfeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Winston v. U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution GroupDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023