Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wolfe

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 30, 2023No. 1:21-cv-02642Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND HAMMEL J. CLARK, * Petitioner, * v. * Civ. No. DLB-21-2642 THOMAS WOLFE, Warden, et al., * Respondents. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Self-represented petitioner Hammel J. Clark filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the validity of his state conviction. ECF 1. The respondents assert that the petition is time-barred. ECF 5. Pursuant to Hill v. Braxton,

277 F.3d 701, 707

(4th Cir. 2002), Clark was afforded an opportunity to explain why his petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. ECF…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API